Continue vs GitHub Copilot
Continue is for developers seeking open source flexibility and local AI model support, while GitHub Copilot offers a streamlined, closed-source autocomplete experience with a free tier.
Our Take
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Continue | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Source Model | Open source | Closed source |
| Pricing Structure | Usage-based or per-seat | Per-user monthly |
| Local Model Support | Yes | No |
| Primary AI Focus | Local models, extensibility | Autocomplete |
Pricing
- Starter$3 / million tokens
- Team$20 / seat / month
- CompanyCustom pricing
- Pro$10/user/month
- Pro+$39/user/month
When to Choose
Choose Continue when…
Choose Continue if you prioritize an open source solution and the flexibility to use local AI models. It suits developers who need fine-grained control over their AI environment or prefer usage-based billing for individual projects. This tool is ideal for those who value transparency and community-driven development.
Choose GitHub Copilot when…
Choose GitHub Copilot if you need a reliable, closed-source AI assistant primarily for code autocomplete. Its free tier makes it an excellent starting point for individual developers, and its fixed monthly pricing simplifies budgeting. This is a strong choice for those integrated into the GitHub ecosystem seeking a streamlined experience.
Pros & Cons
Continue
Pros
- ✓Open source model for transparency and customization.
- ✓Supports local AI models, enhancing privacy and control.
- ✓Offers usage-based pricing for individual developers.
Cons
- ✗Lacks a free tier for initial exploration.
- ✗Company plan requires custom pricing, less transparent.
GitHub Copilot
Pros
- ✓Provides a free tier, making it accessible for individuals.
- ✓Offers straightforward per-user monthly pricing.
- ✓Strong focus on AI-powered code autocomplete.
Cons
- ✗Closed source nature limits transparency and extensibility.
- ✗Does not support running local AI models.