Continue vs Cursor

Continue suits developers seeking an open-source, integrated AI assistant with local model support, while Cursor offers a standalone AI-native IDE with a free tier and agent capabilities.

Our Take

Both Continue and Cursor are AI coding tools with a freemium pricing model and do not support self-hosting. The most significant difference between Continue and Cursor lies in their fundamental approach to integration and source model. Continue is an open-source extension designed to augment your existing VSCode or JetBrains environment, offering deep integration and the flexibility to run local models. Cursor, conversely, is a closed-source, standalone IDE built from the ground up with AI at its core, providing a fully integrated development experience. Continue appeals to developers who value transparency, customisation, and the ability to keep their code and models entirely local. Its pricing includes a usage-based option, which can be cost-effective for individual use, though it lacks a free tier. Cursor, on the other hand, offers a free tier, making it accessible for initial exploration, and provides a more opinionated, AI-first environment with features like agent mode. Its tiered monthly subscriptions offer predictable costs for those who commit to its dedicated IDE. Developers committed to their current IDE and seeking an open-source, privacy-focused AI assistant should choose Continue. Cursor is the right choice for those ready to embrace a new, dedicated AI-native IDE with advanced features and a clear subscription model.

Feature Comparison

FeatureContinueCursor
Primary IntegrationVSCode/JetBrains extensionStandalone IDE
Source ModelOpen sourceClosed source
Free Tier AvailableNoYes
Pricing StructureUsage-based or per-seatTiered monthly, per-user
Local Model SupportYesNot a primary feature
Agent ModeNot specifiedYes

Pricing

ContinuefreemiumNo free tier
  • Starter$3 / million tokens
  • Team$20 / seat / month
  • CompanyCustom pricing
CursorfreemiumFree tier
  • Pro$20/mo
  • Pro+$60/mo
  • Ultra$200/mo
  • Teams$40/user/mo
  • EnterpriseContact Sales
  • Bugbot Pro$40/user/mo
  • Bugbot Teams$40/user/mo
  • Bugbot EnterpriseContact Sales

When to Choose

Choose Continue when…

Choose Continue if you prefer an open-source solution that integrates directly into your existing VSCode or JetBrains workflow. It's ideal for those who need local model support for privacy or customisation, and appreciate flexible usage-based pricing.

Choose Cursor when…

Pick Cursor if you desire a dedicated, standalone AI-native IDE experience with a free tier to start. It's well-suited for developers who value advanced agent mode features and prefer predictable monthly subscription costs for a comprehensive environment.

Pros & Cons

Continue

Pros

  • Open source, fostering community contributions and transparency.
  • Seamless integration as an extension into VSCode and JetBrains.
  • Supports local model execution for enhanced privacy and control.
  • Offers a usage-based pricing option for cost flexibility.

Cons

  • Does not offer a free tier for individual users.
  • Requires an existing IDE setup, not a standalone application.
  • Team pricing is per-seat, which can add up for larger teams.

Cursor

Pros

  • Includes a free tier for developers to get started without cost.
  • Provides a complete, dedicated standalone IDE experience.
  • Features advanced agent mode capabilities for complex coding tasks.
  • Predictable monthly tiered pricing for individual plans.

Cons

  • Closed source, limiting user insight into its internal workings.
  • Higher monthly costs for premium individual and team plans.
  • Does not primarily focus on local model execution.

Related Comparisons