PocketBase vs Turso
PocketBase is for developers needing a simple, self-hostable full BaaS with auth, while Turso provides a managed, globally distributed SQLite-compatible database for edge applications.
Our Take
Feature Comparison
| Feature | PocketBase | Turso |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Open-source | Freemium |
| Primary Focus | Full BaaS, Auth | Edge Database |
| GitHub Stars | 57652 | 16611 |
| npm Weekly Downloads | 200740 | 855822 |
| Latest Release | April 2026 | February 2025 |
Pricing
Pay-as-you-go pricing
- Developer$4.99/month
- Scaler$24.92/month
- Pro$416.58/month
- Enterprisecontact sales
When to Choose
Choose PocketBase when…
Choose PocketBase if you need a complete, self-hostable backend-as-a-service with built-in authentication, file storage, and a real-time database. Its single-file deployment makes it ideal for rapid development and projects where simplicity and a bundled solution are key. It's perfect for developers who prefer a full stack in one Go binary.
Choose Turso when…
Pick Turso when your application requires a globally distributed, low-latency SQLite-compatible database at the edge. It excels for projects needing a managed database service that can scale across regions, offering a robust solution for data-intensive applications. Turso is suitable for those building with a database-first approach.
Pros & Cons
PocketBase
Pros
- ✓Full BaaS capabilities (database, auth, file storage, real-time) built-in.
- ✓Single executable for easy deployment and self-hosting.
- ✓Very active development with recent releases (April 2026).
- ✓Higher GitHub stars (57k+) indicates strong community adoption for a full BaaS.
Cons
- ✗Primarily focused on SQLite, which might not suit all large-scale or distributed needs.
- ✗Lower npm weekly downloads compared to Turso's client library.
Turso
Pros
- ✓Optimized for edge deployments and global distribution with SQLite-compatible databases.
- ✓High npm weekly downloads (850k+) suggests widespread client library usage.
- ✓Offers managed service tiers with clear pricing beyond self-hosting.
Cons
- ✗GitHub stars are lower (16k+) compared to PocketBase.
- ✗Latest release is older (February 2025) compared to PocketBase.
- ✗Requires separate services for auth, file storage, etc., as it's a database-first solution.