PocketBase vs Turso

PocketBase is for developers needing a simple, self-hostable full BaaS with auth, while Turso provides a managed, globally distributed SQLite-compatible database for edge applications.

Our Take

Both PocketBase and Turso are open-source, self-hostable, and offer a free tier. PocketBase offers a complete backend-as-a-service, bundling a database, authentication, file storage, and real-time subscriptions into a single Go executable. This makes it an excellent choice for developers seeking a highly integrated, self-hostable solution that simplifies deployment and reduces external dependencies. Its recent release in April 2026 and high GitHub star count reflect active development and community interest in its all-in-one approach. Turso, in contrast, focuses on providing a globally distributed, edge-optimized database built on SQLite. It's designed for applications requiring low-latency data access across multiple regions, offering a managed service that scales beyond a single instance. While it requires integrating separate services for features like authentication, its impressive npm weekly downloads indicate strong adoption for its specialized database capabilities. Developers prioritizing a bundled, easy-to-deploy full backend should choose PocketBase. Turso is the superior option for projects demanding a high-performance, globally distributed SQLite-compatible database at the edge, especially when a managed service is preferred.

Feature Comparison

FeaturePocketBaseTurso
Pricing ModelOpen-sourceFreemium
Primary FocusFull BaaS, AuthEdge Database
GitHub Stars5765216611
npm Weekly Downloads200740855822
Latest ReleaseApril 2026February 2025

Pricing

PocketBaseopen-sourceFree tier

Pay-as-you-go pricing

TursofreemiumFree tier
  • Developer$4.99/month
  • Scaler$24.92/month
  • Pro$416.58/month
  • Enterprisecontact sales

When to Choose

Choose PocketBase when…

Choose PocketBase if you need a complete, self-hostable backend-as-a-service with built-in authentication, file storage, and a real-time database. Its single-file deployment makes it ideal for rapid development and projects where simplicity and a bundled solution are key. It's perfect for developers who prefer a full stack in one Go binary.

Choose Turso when…

Pick Turso when your application requires a globally distributed, low-latency SQLite-compatible database at the edge. It excels for projects needing a managed database service that can scale across regions, offering a robust solution for data-intensive applications. Turso is suitable for those building with a database-first approach.

Pros & Cons

PocketBase

Pros

  • Full BaaS capabilities (database, auth, file storage, real-time) built-in.
  • Single executable for easy deployment and self-hosting.
  • Very active development with recent releases (April 2026).
  • Higher GitHub stars (57k+) indicates strong community adoption for a full BaaS.

Cons

  • Primarily focused on SQLite, which might not suit all large-scale or distributed needs.
  • Lower npm weekly downloads compared to Turso's client library.

Turso

Pros

  • Optimized for edge deployments and global distribution with SQLite-compatible databases.
  • High npm weekly downloads (850k+) suggests widespread client library usage.
  • Offers managed service tiers with clear pricing beyond self-hosting.

Cons

  • GitHub stars are lower (16k+) compared to PocketBase.
  • Latest release is older (February 2025) compared to PocketBase.
  • Requires separate services for auth, file storage, etc., as it's a database-first solution.

Related Comparisons