PlanetScale vs Supabase

PlanetScale excels for specialized serverless MySQL/Postgres needs with lower entry costs, while Supabase offers a comprehensive open-source BaaS with auth, DB, and storage for full application backends.

Our Take

Both PlanetScale and Supabase share a freemium pricing model, offer a free tier, and provide serverless Postgres capabilities. The fundamental difference between PlanetScale and Supabase lies in their scope: PlanetScale is a specialized serverless database, while Supabase is a full Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). PlanetScale focuses on delivering a highly scalable MySQL or Postgres database, offering a lower entry point for paid plans at $5/month for a Postgres node and usage-based pricing for storage and egress. It operates as a closed-source service without self-hosting options, making it a strong choice for developers who need a robust database solution without the complexities of managing an entire backend stack. Supabase, conversely, provides a comprehensive open-source BaaS that bundles authentication, a Postgres database, and storage into a single platform. Its open-source nature allows for self-hosting, appealing to teams that require full control over their infrastructure. With significantly higher community adoption, evidenced by its 18 million weekly npm downloads and over 100,000 GitHub stars, Supabase is built for developers looking to rapidly build full applications with an integrated, extensible backend. Developers who need a full BaaS — auth, storage, and database in one — should pick Supabase. PlanetScale is the right call when a specialized, scalable serverless MySQL or Postgres database is the primary requirement, especially for those seeking a lower monthly cost entry point.

Feature Comparison

FeaturePlanetScaleSupabase
Primary offeringServerless MySQL/Postgres databaseFull BaaS (Auth, DB, Storage)
Self-hostingNoYes
Source modelClosed sourceOpen source
Lowest paid plan$5/month (Postgres Single node)$25/month (Pro)
npm weekly downloads225,93418,377,301

Pricing

PlanetScalefreemiumFree tier
  • PlanetScale Postgres Single node$5/month
  • PlanetScale Metal$50/month
  • PS-5 1/16 vCPU · 512 MB memory · 10 GB storage$15
  • Base Plan - Storage$0.50 per GB per instance
  • Base Plan - Egress bandwidth$0.06 / GB
  • Enterprisecontact sales
  • PlanetScale Managedcontact sales
SupabasefreemiumFree tier
  • Pro$25/mo
  • Team$599/mo
  • Enterprisecontact sales

When to Choose

Choose PlanetScale when…

When you primarily need a highly scalable serverless MySQL or Postgres database without the overhead of a full BaaS. Its $5/month entry point for a Postgres node makes it cost-effective for database-centric projects. Choose PlanetScale if you prioritize a specialized database solution with usage-based scaling for storage and egress.

Choose Supabase when…

When you require a complete open-source Backend-as-a-Service solution, including authentication, a Postgres database, and storage. Its self-hosting capability and extensive ecosystem make it ideal for developers seeking full control and a comprehensive platform. Pick Supabase for projects that need a full backend stack out-of-the-box.

Pros & Cons

PlanetScale

Pros

  • Lower entry point for paid database plans starting at $5/month.
  • Specialized focus on serverless MySQL/Postgres database.
  • Usage-based pricing for storage and egress bandwidth.

Cons

  • Closed-source, preventing self-hosting.
  • Lacks a full BaaS suite (e.g., no integrated auth or storage).
  • Lower overall community adoption compared to Supabase's ecosystem.

Supabase

Pros

  • Comprehensive Backend-as-a-Service with integrated auth, database, and storage.
  • Open-source and self-hostable.
  • Extremely high npm weekly downloads (18M+) and GitHub stars (100k+).
  • Offers a complete platform for full application development.

Cons

  • Higher starting price for paid plans ($25/month Pro tier).
  • May be more complex than needed for database-only projects.

Related Comparisons